<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>InfoDesign: Understanding by Design</title>
<link>http://www.informationdesign.org/</link>
<description>Dedicated to the growth and improvement of the information experience industries.</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>plato@xs4all.nl</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01-02T11:16:35+01:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=4.21-en" />
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>


<item>
<title>Using Tags to Increase Findability</title>
<description>Tagging content, references or other BLOBs systematically is not for everybody an easy task. Most are just lazy.
&quot;Although I&apos;ve explored different strategies for findability, it seems that faceted classification through the attachment of metadata (such as tags) to resources remains the most compelling strategy. It can suit a diversity of audiences, purposes, and needs.&quot;
(Thom Johnson a.k.a. @tomjohnson ~ I&apos;d Rather Be Writing)</description>

<!-- 
<link>http://www.informationdesign.org/archives/2012/01/#006295</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6295@http://www.informationdesign.org/</guid>
 -->

<dc:subject>Metadata</dc:subject>

<dc:date>2012-01-02T11:16:35+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Browse versus Search: Which Deserves to Go?</title>
<description>Finding nuggets in the dance between Ms. Browse and Mr. Search.
&quot;(...) there are two kinds of people in the world: Searchers and Browsers. Searchers can browse when required, and Browsers can search when required. Neither is drawn to the other. (...) With these changes, both Browse and Search are improved, making everyone happy.&quot;
(Bruce &apos;Tog&apos; Tognazzini a.k.a. @asktog)</description>

<!-- 
<link>http://www.informationdesign.org/archives/2011/12/#006278</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6278@http://www.informationdesign.org/</guid>
 -->

<dc:subject>Search</dc:subject>

<dc:date>2011-12-06T10:36:59+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Site Search Analytics: A Conversation with Lou Rosenfeld</title>
<description>Adding some more buzz to the launch.
&quot;Lou Rosenfeld&apos;s newest book, Search Analytics for Your Site: Conversations with Your Customers, has been the subject of more prelaunch buzz than most UX books have gotten this year. It seemed everyone was tweeting, talking, or speculating about it before the ink had even had a chance to dry. And, true to the hype, this book delivers in spades. If you read one book this year to hone your craft, add value to your UX practice, or enable you to help your clients, this is the one! Lou recently found some time in his very hectic schedule to sit down and talk with me about his book and the burgeoning practice of site search analytics (SSA).&quot;
(Kristina Mausser a.k.a. @krismausser ~ UXmatters)</description>

<!-- 
<link>http://www.informationdesign.org/archives/2011/07/#006130</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6130@http://www.informationdesign.org/</guid>
 -->

<dc:subject>Search</dc:subject>

<dc:date>2011-07-18T12:56:25+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>A Taxonomy of Enterprise Search</title>
<description>&quot;To design better search and discovery experiences we must understand the complexities of the human-information seeking process. Numerous theoretical frameworks have been proposed to characterize this complex process, notably the standard model, the cognitive model and the dynamic model. In addition, others have investigated search as a strategic process, examining the various problem solving strategies and tactics that information seekers employ over extended periods of time. In this paper, we examine the needs and behaviours of varied individuals across a range of search and discovery scenarios within various types of enterprise. These are based on an analysis of the scenarios derived from numerous engagements involving the development of search and business intelligence solutions utilizing the Endeca Latitude software platform. In so doing, we extend the classic IR concept of information-seeking to a broader notion of discovery-oriented problem solving, accommodating the much wider range of behaviours required to fulfil the typical goals and objectives of enterprise knowledge workers.&quot;
(Tony Russell-Rose a.k.a. @tonygrr ~ Information Interaction) - courtesy of jameskalbach</description>

<!-- 
<link>http://www.informationdesign.org/archives/2011/07/#006120</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6120@http://www.informationdesign.org/</guid>
 -->

<dc:subject>Information architecture</dc:subject>

<dc:date>2011-07-12T15:53:12+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Search Analytics for Your Site: Conversations With Your Customers</title>
<description>&quot;Any organization that has a searchable web site or intranet is sitting on top of hugely valuable and usually under-exploited data: logs that capture what users are searching for, how often each query was searched, and how many results each query retrieved. Search queries are gold: they are real data that show us exactly what users are searching for in their own words. This book shows you how to use search analytics to carry on a conversation with your customers: listen to and understand their needs, and improve your content, navigation and search performance to meet those needs.&quot;
(Louis Rosenfeld a.k.a. @louisrosenfeld ~ Rosenfeld Media)</description>

<!-- 
<link>http://www.informationdesign.org/archives/2011/07/#006112</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6112@http://www.informationdesign.org/</guid>
 -->

<dc:subject>Search</dc:subject>

<dc:date>2011-07-06T16:59:39+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Novices Orienteer, Experts Teleport: The effect of expertise on search behaviour</title>
<description>&quot;Expertise significantly impacts how we seek information online. Just as novice and expert photographers prefer different tools, so novices and experts behave differently when searching for information. Understanding these differences will help us design better search interfaces for both groups of users.&quot; (Tyler Tate ~ Boxes and Arrows)
</description>

<!-- 
<link>http://www.informationdesign.org/archives/2011/04/#006031</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6031@http://www.informationdesign.org/</guid>
 -->

<dc:subject>Search</dc:subject>

<dc:date>2011-04-21T12:49:39+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Are SEO practitioners the digital equivalent of bankers?</title>
<description>&quot;When I think about the banking industry, I&apos;m reminded of the world of Search Engine Marketing. They too are trying to find weaknesses in a set of rules designed to level the playing field, in order to create a competitive advantage for their clients. It&apos;s just that rather than these rules being laid down by central government, they have been developed in the labs at Google.&quot; (Andy Budd ~ Blogography)</description>

<!-- 
<link>http://www.informationdesign.org/archives/2011/04/#006000</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6000@http://www.informationdesign.org/</guid>
 -->

<dc:subject>Search</dc:subject>

<dc:date>2011-04-01T14:50:21+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Findability and The Information Paradox</title>
<description>&quot;(...) a summary of why findability becomes an issue for technical writers, and what the information paradox is that we encounter. Then, in an usual ethical twist, I’ll explain why findability might not actually be an issue.&quot; (Tom Johnson)</description>

<!-- 
<link>http://www.informationdesign.org/archives/2011/01/#005876</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5876@http://www.informationdesign.org/</guid>
 -->

<dc:subject>Information architecture</dc:subject>

<dc:date>2011-01-13T16:56:20+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lou Rosenfeld On Search Analytics</title>
<description>&quot;So one thing I encourage people to do is to try to categorise the data in other words gee it seems like there is a lot of queries here about physical places, maybe our organisation has different offices or campuses or different buildings, look for things that seem to be people or different topics that emerge what you start doing is that you force yourself to get very close to the way users are thinking because you are looking at what their needs are, and actually it is a good way of looking at what sort of metadata your site ought to have and what kinds of content type people seem to be asking for and it might even help you do things like prioritise your next content migration because you start getting a sense of what are the really important content types that people seem to be requesting when they are searching so there are other things which you might delve into.&quot; (Boagworld)</description>

<!-- 
<link>http://www.informationdesign.org/archives/2010/07/#005663</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5663@http://www.informationdesign.org/</guid>
 -->

<dc:subject>Interviews</dc:subject>

<dc:date>2010-07-07T16:56:50+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Beyond Findability: Search-Enhanced IA for Content-Intensive RIAs</title>
<description>&quot;This paper details a way to extend classic information architecture for web-based applications. The goal is to enhance traditional user experiences, mainly based on navigation or search, to new ones (also relevant for stakeholders’ requirements). Examples are sense making, at a glance understanding, playful exploration, serendipitous browsing, and brand communication. These new experiences are often unmet by current information architecture solutions, which may be stiff and difficult to scale, especially in the case of large or very large websites. A heavy reliance upon search engines seems not to offer a viable solution: it supports, in fact, a limited range of user experiences. We propose to transform (parts of) websites into Rich Internet Applications (RIAs), based, beside other features, upon interaction-rich interfaces and semantic browsing across content. We introduce SEE-IA (SEarch-Enhanced Information Architecture), a coherent set of information architecture design strategies, which innovatively blend and extend IA and search paradigms.&quot; (Spagnolo, L., Bolchini, D., Paolini, P., &amp; Di Blas, N. ~ Journal of Information Architecture No. 3)</description>

<!-- 
<link>http://www.informationdesign.org/archives/2010/07/#005656</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5656@http://www.informationdesign.org/</guid>
 -->

<dc:subject>Information architecture</dc:subject>

<dc:date>2010-07-01T14:15:11+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Innovation at Google: The physics of data </title>
<description>&quot;Today, we measure the size of the Web in exabytes and are uploading to it 15 times more data than we were 3 years ago. Technologies for sensing, storing, and sharing information are driving innovation in the tools available to help us understand our world in greater detail and accuracy than ever before. The implications of analyzing data on a massive scale transcend the tech industry, impacting the environmental sector, social justice issues, health and science research, and more. When coupled with astute technical insight, data is dynamic, accessible, and ultimately, creative.&quot; (Marissa Mayer)</description>

<!-- 
<link>http://www.informationdesign.org/archives/2010/05/#005606</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5606@http://www.informationdesign.org/</guid>
 -->

<dc:subject>Information design</dc:subject>

<dc:date>2010-05-31T15:05:16+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Understanding the Cost of We Can&apos;t Find Anything</title>
<description>&quot;One problem I often hear when talking with any organization about new solutions is understanding the cost and inefficiency of their existing way solutions, processes, or general way of doing things. In the past year or two I have used various general measurements around search to help focus the need for improvement not only on search, but the needed information and metadata needed to improve search.&quot; (Thomas Vander Wal)</description>

<!-- 
<link>http://www.informationdesign.org/archives/2010/05/#005590</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5590@http://www.informationdesign.org/</guid>
 -->

<dc:subject>Metadata</dc:subject>

<dc:date>2010-05-21T14:46:53+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Findability and Exploration: The future of search</title>
<description>&quot;The majority of people visiting a news website don&apos;t care about the front page. They might have reached your site from Google while searching for a very specific topic. They might just be wandering around. Or they&apos;re visiting your site because they&apos;re interested in one specific event that you cover. This is big. It changes the way we should think about news websites.&quot; (Stijn Debrouwere) courtesy of petermorville</description>

<!-- 
<link>http://www.informationdesign.org/archives/2010/05/#005571</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5571@http://www.informationdesign.org/</guid>
 -->

<dc:subject>Navigation</dc:subject>

<dc:date>2010-05-04T09:48:24+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>In Search of Novel Ways to Design Large Cultural Web Sites</title>
<description>&quot;In this paper, we illustrate how Rich Internet Applications (RIAs), combining lightweight information architecture with advanced search paradigms (like faceted search) and interactive visualization strategies, can be used to better support a number of communication goals. The examples are taken from the new Web site for the Directorate General of Antiquity of the Italian Ministry for Culture Heritage (to become public in Autumn 2010), where both a huge amount of content (the Italian archeological heritage) and a variety of users’ profiles (from scholars to amateurs and tourists) are managed.&quot; (Stefano De Caro, Nicoletta Di Blas, and Luigi Spagnolo ~ Museums And The Web 2010) courtesy of petermorville</description>

<!-- 
<link>http://www.informationdesign.org/archives/2010/05/#005570</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5570@http://www.informationdesign.org/</guid>
 -->

<dc:subject>Information architecture</dc:subject>

<dc:date>2010-05-04T09:24:17+01:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item>
<title>Design Patterns for Mobile Faceted Search: Part II</title>
<description>&quot;This month&apos;s column covers strategies for making people more aware of the filtering options that are available to them, as well as methods of improving transitions between the various states a user encounters in a search user interface.&quot; (Greg Nudelman ~ UXmatters)</description>

<!-- 
<link>http://www.informationdesign.org/archives/2010/05/#005568</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5568@http://www.informationdesign.org/</guid>
 -->

<dc:subject>Mobile design</dc:subject>

<dc:date>2010-05-03T09:56:19+01:00</dc:date>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
