|
Categories
Powered by
|
Metadata Are you prepared for the Semantic Web?"If you want to stay ahead of the web publishing curve, now is the time to start learning and experimenting with the Semantic Web. It’s been in development since the ’90s, led by Tim Berners-Lee himself. When media historians write books about the information transformation we are in (from print to web), the Semantic Web will be at least as important as the invention of HTML. Having Semantic Web-enabled pages will soon be a big competitive advantage for you and your company." (Writing for Digital) Posted on July 20, 2010 | Permalink Topic Maps: From Information to Discourse Architecture"Topic Maps is a standards-based technology and model for organizing and integrating digital information in a range of applications and domains. Drawing on notions adapted from current discourse theory, this article focuses on the communicative, or explanatory, potential of topic maps. It is demonstrated that topic maps may be structured in ways that are 'text-like' in character and, therefore, conducive to more expository or discursive forms of machine-readable information architecture. More specifically, it is exemplified how a certain measure of 'texture', i.e. textual cohesion and coherence, may be built into topic maps. Further, it is argued that the capability to represent and organize discourse structure may prove useful, if not essential, in systems and services associated with the emerging Socio-Semantic Web. As an example, it is illustrated how topic maps may be put to use within an area such as distributed semantic micro-blogging." (Lars Johnsen ~ Journal of Information Architecture No. 3) Posted on July 01, 2010 | Permalink Taxonomy: A 'Disambiguation'"Taxonomy is an ancient scientific practice. It means to find names for things. In naming things, you try to figure out how sets of things are related to one another, so that each, unique item will not only have a unique name, but also a reference to the others to which it relates. Taxonomy creates a hierarchy of inheritance, from general down to specific and back: A giant tree, on which there is a unique place for every item, like the leaves at the ends of twigs at the ends of branches connected to a trunk and running deep into the earth." (The Content Strategy Noob) courtesy of basevers Posted on June 18, 2010 | Permalink Understanding the Cost of We Can't Find Anything"One problem I often hear when talking with any organization about new solutions is understanding the cost and inefficiency of their existing way solutions, processes, or general way of doing things. In the past year or two I have used various general measurements around search to help focus the need for improvement not only on search, but the needed information and metadata needed to improve search." (Thomas Vander Wal) Posted on May 21, 2010 | Permalink Interacting with the Semantic Web"It's about the lines, not the points." (Duane Degler ~ Design for Context) Posted on May 04, 2010 | Permalink Findability and Exploration: The future of search"The majority of people visiting a news website don't care about the front page. They might have reached your site from Google while searching for a very specific topic. They might just be wandering around. Or they're visiting your site because they're interested in one specific event that you cover. This is big. It changes the way we should think about news websites." (Stijn Debrouwere) courtesy of petermorville Posted on May 04, 2010 | Permalink Classification Schemes (and when to use them)"When you do information architecture work you’ll realize that most sets of content can be organized in more than one way. One of the challenges for an IA project is figuring out what way works best for your audience, your content and your project’s goals." (Donna Maurer - UXBooth) Posted on April 28, 2010 | Permalink The Art of Narrative and the Semantic Web"The art of the narrative is one of the strongest threads running through our society and culture, and is in many respects one of the defining traits of humanity. 'The story' is more than just a recitation of facts or assertions (whether real or otherwise). A good story is experiential. It puts each of us as listeners into the narrator's world and frame of mind, let's us live, vicariously, through the experiences that the narrator had or conceived. In many cases we identify with the protagonist, whether the story is an epic fantasy journey through lost worlds, a sports article talking about the clash between two rival football teams, or the reportage of a major political event. We read meaning into these narratives at many level, from the bald statement of fact to the subtle interplay of analysis, implication, innuendo and metaphor, and it is the richness of these metaphors that give meaning to the work." (Kurt Cagle - DevX) Posted on March 05, 2010 | Permalink Social Tagging and the Enterprise: Does Tagging Work at Work?"Organizations are interested in using social tagging technology both within workgroups and across the enterprise. Tagging can supplement information retrieval options in intranets and document management systems, allowing employees to use tags to enhance the findability of internal and external content without waiting for an information professional to categorize it." (Stephanie Lemieux - User Interface Engineering) Posted on March 02, 2010 | Permalink Using Microformats: Gateway to the Semantic Web"In this podcast Karl Stolley discusses his article, Using Microformats: Gateway to the Semantic Web, which appears in the September, 2009 issue of Transactions on Professional Communication. In the article Stolley explains and describes the use of several microformats, which make information marked up in HTML available for use in applications outside of traditional web browsers. Because microformats consist of minor additions to the HTML backbone of common webpages, they represent a simple but significant move toward what Tim Berners-Lee has called the Semantic Web—but without requiring the technical and practical shifts and time demands of a complete XML-based semantic web development approach." (Karl Stolley - IEEE Professional Communication Society) Posted on October 02, 2009 | Permalink Survival for the fittest tagFolksonomies, findability, and the evolution of information organization - "Folksonomies have emerged as a means to create order in a rapidly expanding information environment whose existing means to organize content have been strained. This paper examines folksonomies from an evolutionary perspective, viewing the changing conditions of the information environment as having given rise to organization adaptations in order to ensure information “survival” — remaining findable. This essay traces historical information organization mechanisms, the conditions that gave rise to folksonomies, and the scholarly response, review, and recommendations for the future of folksonomies." - (Alexis Wichowski - First Monday 14.5) Posted on May 19, 2009 | Permalink Do Tags Work?"Tag! You're it! It seems that everywhere I go on the Web these days is tagged." - (Cathy Marshall - TEKKA 10) Posted on May 08, 2009 | Permalink Studying Social Tagging and Folksonomy: A Review and Framework"This paper reviews research into social tagging and folksonomy (as reflected in about 180 sources published through December 2007). Methods of researching the contribution of social tagging and folksonomy are described, and outstanding research questions are presented. This is a new area of research, where theoretical perspectives and relevant research methods are only now being defined. This paper provides a framework for the study of folksonomy, tagging and social tagging systems. Three broad approaches are identified, focusing first, on the folksonomy itself (and the role of tags in indexing and retrieval); secondly, on tagging (and the behaviour of users); and thirdly, on the nature of social tagging systems (as socio-technical framework)." - (dList) - courtesy of jjursa Posted on April 20, 2009 | Permalink The next Web of open, linked dataTim Berners-Lee on TED 2009 - "Twenty years ago, Tim Berners-Lee invented the World Wide Web. For his next project, he's building a web for open, linked data that could do for numbers what the Web did for words, pictures, video: unlock our data and reframe the way we use it together." - (TED Blog) Posted on March 13, 2009 | Permalink Tim Berners-Lee speaks on Linked Data"This slide set was presented at the TED 2009 conference, 'The Great Unveiling' in Long Beach, CA. USA, 4, Feb 2009." - (W3C) Posted on February 18, 2009 | Permalink Optimizing Tagging UI for People and Search"This content has come from more than four years of research and discussions with people using tools, both inside enterprise and using consumer web tools. As enterprise moves more quickly toward more cost effective tools for capturing and connecting information, they are aware of not only the value of social tools, but tools that get out the way and allow humans to capture, share, and interact in a manner that is as natural as possible with the tools getting smart, not humans having to adopt technology patterns." (Thomas Vanderwal) Posted on January 27, 2009 | Permalink Metadata fundamentals for intranets and websites"This article explores the fundamentals of metadata, as it relates to common intranet and website needs." (James Robertson - Step Two Designs) Posted on October 20, 2008 | Permalink Web 3.0: The Rise of the Machines"The next web will be one of placing humans in context with their objects and visa versa. We'll use the data our objects provide to better observe and manage them, and the energy they require to own, operate, manufacture, and disassemble." (Dan Saffer - Kicker Studio) Posted on October 15, 2008 | Permalink Ontology of Folksonomy: A Mash-up of Apples and Oranges"Ontologies are enabling technology for the Semantic Web. They are a means for people to state what they mean by the terms used in data that they might generate, share, or consume. Folksonomies are an emergent phenomenon of the Social Web. They arise from data about how people associate terms with content that they generate, share, or consume. Recently the two ideas have been put into opposition, as if they were right and left poles of a political spectrum. This is a false dichotomy; they are more like apples and oranges. In fact, as the Semantic Web matures and the Social Web grows, there is increasing value in applying Semantic Web technologies to the data of the Social Web. This article is an attempt to clarify the distinct roles for ontologies and folksonomies, and previews some new work that applies the two ideas together - an ontology of folksonomy." (Tom Gruber) Posted on October 14, 2008 | Permalink Ontology"In the context of computer and information sciences, an ontology defines a set of representational primitives with which to model a domain of knowledge or discourse." (Tom Gruber) Posted on October 14, 2008 | Permalink Keeping Up With Social TaggingVideo presentation - Thomas Vander Wal presents during the experts workshop 'Social tagging in the knowledge organisation: Perspectives and potentials' on January 21, 2008 - courtesy of wolf nöding Posted on May 30, 2008 | Permalink Where the Social Web Meets the Semantic Web"The Semantic Web is an ecosystem of interaction among computer systems. The social web is an ecosystem of conversation among people. Both are enabled by conventions for layered services and data exchange. Both are driven by human-generated content and made scalable by machine-readable data. Yet there is a popular misconception that the two worlds are alternative, opposing ideologies about how the web ought to be. Folksonomy vs. ontology. Practical vs. formalistic. Humans vs. machines. This is nonsense, and it is time to embrace a unified view. I subscribe to the vision of the Semantic Web as a substrate for collective intelligence. The best shot we have of collective intelligence in our lifetimes is large, distributed human-computer systems. The best way to get there is to harness the 'people power' of the Web with the techniques of the Semantic Web. In this presentation I will show several ways that this can be, and is, happening." (Tom Gruber) Posted on April 14, 2008 | Permalink Tim Berners-Lee Says the Time for the Semantic Web is Now"In an hour long interview posted today about the Semantic Web, W3C Director Tim Berners-Lee says all the pieces are in place to move full steam ahead and realize the potential of a world of structured, machine readable data. Available as a part of the Talking with Talis semantic web podcast series, the interview (...) is summarized on interviewer Paul Miller's new ZDNet blog dedicated to the semantic web." (ReadWriteWeb) Posted on February 28, 2008 | Permalink Better Living Through Taxonomies"Large websites and intranets can benefit from improved methods of search and navigation. These include site maps, A-Z indexes, sophisticated search engines, and generally improved navigational design—and playing a potential role in all of these methods is well-planned taxonomy." (Heather Hedden - Digital Web Magazine) Posted on February 06, 2008 | Permalink Folksonomies and Image Tagging: Seeing the Future?"Folksonomies are one of today's hottest Internet trends. They are but one part of Web 2.0, which, in part, refers to the ability of Internet users to add, change and improve World Wide Web content. A folksonomy is created as users of a website add 'tags' (keywords) to describe items on a website. The users choose their own keywords; few or no restrictions are imposed on their choices. The terms are not chosen from a previously existing controlled vocabulary, a strict taxonomy or any other officially sanctioned method of bibliographic description." (Diane Neal - ASIS&T Bulletin Oct/Nov 2007) Posted on October 09, 2007 | Permalink Web Ontology and the Semantic Web"(...) Tim Berners-Lee's design for the Semantic Web will enable automatic collection and correlation of various parts of information about an object, available at various different web resources. The Semantic Web will save the valuable time we spend on navigating from one web resource to another in order to obtain meaningful information on a particular object. We would be happy then on finding out, for example, our old friend's complete information on giving partial hints on the fly without the need of our manually visiting various related web pages! But wait, there's more." (Goutam Kumar Saha - ACM Ubiquity) Posted on September 04, 2007 | Permalink The Tagging Growth Curve"The apparently irregular growth and spread of tagging is simply example of the real nature of how innovations spread. Professional analysts and other meaning makers tend to draw smooth graphs to depict these things. But in reality, natural systems (and the tagging / technology landscape is a legitimate ecosystem) are noisy, cyclical, chaotic, complex, fuzzy, non-linear, and unpredictable. They only appear to follow smooth curves at a high level of abstraction, or a low level of resolution.” (Joe Lamantia - tagsonomy) Posted on September 04, 2007 | Permalink Is Tagging A Disruptive Innovation?"For many reasons, tagging has not yet emerged - and may never emerge - as a category of technology investment and activity for businesses." (Joe Lamantia - tagsonomy) Posted on July 25, 2007 | Permalink (Not) Everything is Miscellaneous"It's not that I disagree with David about the power and potential of user participation in the creation and organization of knowledge. But, I do believe that the old serves as foundation for and coexists with the new (...)" (Peter Morville - Semantic Studios) Posted on May 03, 2007 | Permalink Metacrap and Flickr Tags: An Interview with Cory Doctorow"David and Cory discuss the advantages and pitfalls of explicit and implicit metadata, tags and the rules governing the use and re-use of content in commerce and culture." (David Weinberger - Epicenter Wired) Posted on May 02, 2007 | Permalink Measuring the success of a classification system"When working with government and large private organizations on complex information systems, project managers and business representatives often demand early-stage validation that the proposed classification system provides the user-friendly solution they are charged with delivering. They also require this validation in a format that will be engaging for senior business stakeholders." (Iain Barker - Boxes and Arrows) Posted on April 24, 2007 | Permalink Metadata for All: Descriptive Standards and Metadata Sharing across Libraries, Archives and Museums"Integrating digital content from libraries, archives and museums represents a persistent challenge. While the history of standards development is rife with examples of cross-community experimentation, in the end, libraries, archives and museums have developed parallel descriptive strategies for cataloguing the materials in their custody. Applying in particular data content standards by material type, and not by community affiliation, could lead to greater data interoperability within the cultural heritage community. In making this argument, the article demystifies metadata by defining and categorizing types of standards, provides a brief historical overview of the rise of descriptive standards in museums, libraries and archives, and considers the current tensions and ambitions in making descriptive practice more economic." (Mary W. Elings and Günter Waibel - First Monday 12.3) Posted on March 14, 2007 | Permalink Taxonomy Out of the Box"Taxonomies - at least some of them - reveal the order of things. They increase knowledge by manifesting multifaceted relationships among things. In that light, tagging and folksonomies look like the vulgarizing of knowledge, and well-bred taxonomies turn up their perky noses at the ill-manner interlopers. But the new taxonomizing does more than increase knowledge. It reveals meaning." (David Weinberger - ASIS&T Bulletin Feb/Mar 2007) - courtesy of theiainstitute Posted on March 02, 2007 | Permalink When tags work and when they don't: Amazon and LibraryThing"This is an extensive post, revealing the results of a statistical comparison between Amazon and LibraryThing tags, and exploring why tagging has turned out relatively poorly for Amazon. I end by making concrete recommendations for ecommerce sites interested in making tagging work." (Thingology - LibraryThing) - courtesy of petermorville Posted on February 26, 2007 | Permalink Pew Internet Report on Tagging"Just as the internet allows users to create and share their own media, it is also enabling them to organize digital material their own way, rather than relying on pre-existing formats of classifying information. A December 2006 survey has found that 28% of internet users have tagged or categorized content online such as photos, news stories or blog posts. On a typical day online, 7% of internet users say they tag or categorize online content. The report features an interview with David Weinberger, a prominent blogger and fellow at Harvard's Berkman Center for Internet & Society." (Pew Internet & American Life Project) - courtesy of tagsonomy Posted on February 01, 2007 | Permalink Folksonomy as symbol"I think folksonomies have excited us because of what they say. They are symbols. But of what?" (David Weinberger) Posted on December 19, 2006 | Permalink W3C Semantic Web Activity"The Semantic Web is a web of data. There is lots of data we all use every day, and its not part of the web. I can see my bank statements on the web, and my photographs, and I can see my appointments in a calendar. But can I see my photos in a calendar to see what I was doing when I took them? Can I see bank statement lines in a calendar? Why not? Because we don't have a web of data. Because data is controlled by applications, and each application keeps it to itself. The Semantic Web is about two things. It is about common formats for interchange of data, where on the original Web we only had interchange of documents. Also it is about language for recording how the data relates to real world objects. That allows a person, or a machine, to start off in one database, and then move through an unending set of databases which are connected not by wires but by being about the same thing." (W3C) Posted on December 12, 2006 | Permalink Democratic folksonomy: in response to 'Beneath the Metadata'"Metadata systems retain their integrity through control over what terms are used to describe the things that they refer to. It wouldn't help anyone if what was generally accepted as a car is referred to as an 'angular-wheely-thing' just because one person chooses to call it this, freely adding it to the folksonomy." (Kevin Shoesmith - Venn Communications Systems) Posted on December 08, 2006 | Permalink Beneath the Metadata: Some Philosophical Problems with Folksonomy"People have been trying to classify and organize information for thousands of years. There are many examples of cataloged items in ancient repositories, including items in the Library of Alexandria in Egypt. Taxonomy arose as an attempt to organize information about plants and animals in the physical world, and Aristotle is often considered the father of classification or taxonomy. In his Categories, he names Substances (nouns) and determines the nine distinctive things that can be said about a particular thing. How we ultimately name something reflects the category to which we assign it. Through the development of categories, one is trying to answer the question, 'What is it?' Taxonomic methodology has also become important in mathematical set theory through discussions of set, class, aggregate, and collection. Neo-Aristotelian realists are as interested today in taxonomy as they are in ontology. Accurate classification is important in most, if not all, disciplines. In today's networked world of digital information, classification has become very important. One gathers, collects, and shares resources, making the organization of databases and websites crucial. Items that are different or strange can become a barrier to networking. Therefore, with the advent of the Internet, structure and consistency of classification or indexing schemes has taken on a new relevancy." (Elaine Peterson - D-Lib Magazine November 2006) / Replies by Thomas vanderWal and David Weinberger - courtesy of thomasvanderwal Posted on November 20, 2006 | Permalink The Web before the Web"In September 2004 I was a guest-blogger for the French online magazine fluctuat.net. I wrote a series of short posts about what could be called 'the precursors of the Web' - or 'the Web minus the technology' (...). Here is an augmented and updated version in English that will be published in the magazine for art and new media aminima N°20. Some of my pieces are described as well, in relation to these precursors." (Christophe Bruno) - courtesy of brucesterling Posted on November 01, 2006 | Permalink Changing Approaches to Metadata at bbc.co.uk: From Chaos to Control and Then Letting Go Again"More and more we expect to break the back of the work with automation while using human brainpower to perfect the results. We will have to harness the power of folksonomies while remembering there is stuff our audience will demand we know about our own content. Most of all, we have to ensure our choices of metadata systems are made with the user in mind." (Karen Loasby - ASIS&T Bulletin Oct/Nov 2006) Posted on October 06, 2006 | Permalink Understanding Folksonomy: Tagging that Works"(...) presentation from d.construct. I have been presenting the content in this for nearly 2 years and have been iterating it. I have been wanting to get the Folksonomy Triad out in public as it has been getting really strong response in the 18 months that I have been using it." (Thomas Vander Wal) Posted on September 24, 2006 | Permalink On Arranging Books by Color"(...) organizing his books by color allows him to discover new and unexpected relationships between books he knows well already. When two unrelated books are forced to occupy the same shelf simply because of their spine color, the shelver is asked to think about whether they have ideas to share between them. Perhaps, the designers of these chromatically-related books saw something in the books' content that even their authors did not. Maybe their ideals share a common hue?" (Rob Giampietro - Design Observer) Posted on August 28, 2006 | Permalink What is RDF?"The SemWeb enables computers to seek out knowledge distributed throughout the Web, mesh it, and then take action based on it. Take an analogy: the current web is a decentralized platform for distributed presentations, while the SemWeb is a decentralized platform for distributed knowledge. Resource Description Framework (RDF) is the W3C standard for encoding knowledge." (Joshua Tauberer - O'Reilly XML.com) Posted on July 28, 2006 | Permalink The 7 (f)laws of the Semantic Web"This entry should be regarded as constructive criticism of the Semantic Web - I still believe in it, but need to bring the flaws (as I see them) in to the open, in the hope that discussion and communication is the first step towards resolving problems." (Dan Zambonini - O'Reilly XML.com) Posted on July 28, 2006 | Permalink Approaches to classification in publishing and knowledge management"Classification of knowledge, and of the objects which contain it such as books and journals, has a long history, but is also a hot topic in the modern world of electronic collections and the World Wide Web. Indeed Tim Berners-Lee argues that the building of ontologies and software agents that can deal with them is central to the vision of the Semantic Web." (Electronic Publishing Specialist Forum) Posted on July 18, 2006 | Permalink Faceted Metadata for Information Architecture and Search"The course, while originating in an academic environment, acknowledged the needs of practitioners by showing us how faceted metadata provides a solution that answers real users’ information-foraging problems and demonstrated two real-world applications of this solution..." (Jessyca Frederick - UXmatters) Posted on July 02, 2006 | Permalink Microformats gets a push, or is it a pull?"(...) we need more metadata. Metadata lets us surf the information tsunami. Microformats are highly useful, but they won't be adopted unless there are apps that make use of them." (David Weinberger - Joho The Blog) Posted on June 02, 2006 | Permalink Collaborative Tagging Workshop @W3'06 Papers"Collaborative tagging seems to address a real need on the Web as demonstrated by the growing popularity of tagging and annotation sites (see del.icio.us, flickr, technorati, RawSugar, Shadows, etc.). The most popular sites already have a combined user base of several millions. The philosophy of what is called Web 2.0, the social Web or also the two-way Web is that users can and should be content creators as well as consumers and it suggests that there is a great deal of untapped potential for tagging to improve how web content is organized, navigated and experienced. Yet it is not yet clear how it will evolve and how it will scale, when, if at all, its usage base will go beyond early adopters. The goal of this workshop is to bring researchers and practitioners together in order to explore both the social and technical issues and challenges involved in Web tagging. We plan to address not only the current state of collaborative tagging, and understand its attractiveness to early adopters but also discuss its future." (W3 Tagging Workshop) Posted on May 25, 2006 | Permalink Folksonomies: The Fall and Rise of Plain-text Tagging"Today's 'hot topic' is collaborative tagging: the classification of items using free-text tags, unconstrained and arbitrary values. Tagging services are separated into two general classifications: 'broad', meaning that many different users can tag a single resource, or 'narrow', meaning that a resource is tagged by only one or a few users." (Emma Tonkin - Ariadne Issue 47) - courtesy of libraryclips Posted on May 04, 2006 | Permalink Defining 'Taxonomy'"There are three basic characteristics of a taxonomy for knowledge management, and to be any good at its job, it needs to fulfil all three functions: 1. A taxonomy is a form of classification scheme. 2. Taxonomies are semantic. 3. A taxonomy is a kind of knowledge map." (Patrick Lambe - Green Chameleon) - courtesy of columntwo Posted on April 23, 2006 | Permalink Talking about Tagging"Seems that not a day goes by without one of my projects discussing tags. As a result, I’ve been keeping with up with the broader conversation about tagging. Here’s what I've heard discussed recently." (Luke Wroblewski - Functioning Form) Posted on April 13, 2006 | Permalink The 'Come To Me' Web"Structured content, micro-formats, ambient findability, the model of attraction, and feeds let me (more closely) do what I want, when I want, how I want. They let me manage how I fulfill my desires; how I accomplish my goals." - Conversation with the people involved included. (Austin Govella - Thinking and Making) - courtesy of iaslash Posted on April 06, 2006 | Permalink The Name Game"Tagging offers a potentially powerful way for a company to organize information by making fresh content immediately searchable, letting users designate terms that make sense to them and providing users with a sense of ownership. This ability for tags to provide so much content-describing power for ordinary folks has given rise to the term 'folksonomy', as opposed to the more restrictive sounding 'taxonomy'." (Michael Fitzgerald - CIO Magazine) - courtesy of keithinstone Posted on April 04, 2006 | Permalink The New Shape of Knowledge: From Trees to Piles of Leaves"The digital revolution is enabling knowledge to slip the bonds of the physical which had, silently, shaped it. Now we get to see its 'natural' shape. What does it look like? How big are topics when they aren't determined by the economics of paper? Who gets to organize it? What are the new principles we're using to organize it? David Weinberger proposes that in the digital world, the most 'natural', efficient and responsive way to manage knowledge is to create huge, distributed piles of leaves, each tagged with as much metadata as possible - including treating the content as metadata - and postponing until the last minute the taxonomizing of the information. What will be the social effects as we move from trees to piles of leaves?" (David Weinberger - Oxford Internet Institute Webcasts) Posted on March 31, 2006 | Permalink What Are Personomies?"Personomies are digital manifestations of an individual. Personomies combine identity (who you are), activity (what you do) and sociality (who you know). They include emails, contacts, blog posts, comments, purchases, page views, forms filled, bookmarks, ads clicked, chats, feeds subscribed and more. All these bits of data that can be tracked back to me belong in my personomy." (Pierre Guillaume Wielezynski - Personomies) - courtesy of boingboing Posted on March 26, 2006 | Permalink Tagging 2.0 at South By"It's more interesting to find a like mind than just a resource." (Christian Crumlish - tagsonomy) Posted on March 13, 2006 | Permalink Second Generation Tag Clouds"To date, tag clouds have been applied to just a few kinds of focuses (links, photos, albums, blog posts are the more recognizable). In the future, expect to see specialized tag cloud implementations emerge for a tremendous variety of semantic fields and focuses: celebrities, cars, properties or homes for sale, hotels and travel destinations, products, sports teams, media of all types, political campaigns, financial markets, brands, etc." (Joe Lamantia) - courtesy of columntwo Posted on February 24, 2006 | Permalink Folksonomies: Tidying up Tags?"In this article we look at what makes folksonomies work. We agree with the premise that tags are no replacement for formal systems, but we see this as being the core quality that makes folksonomy tagging so useful. We begin by looking at the issue of 'sloppy tags', a problem to which critics of folksonomies are keen to allude, and ask if there are ways the folksonomy community could offset such problems and create systems that are conducive to searching, sorting and classifying. We then go on to question this 'tidying up' approach and its underlying assumptions, highlighting issues surrounding removal of low-quality, redundant or nonsense metadata, and the potential risks of tidying too neatly and thereby losing the very openness that has made folksonomies so popular." (Marieke Guy and Emma Tonkin - DLib Magazine 12.1) Posted on January 17, 2006 | Permalink Online Information Folksonomy Presentation"The main focus of this presentation is not that folksonomies should be seen as a replacement to taxonomy, but as a means to augment taxonomies (if there is one in place). As was resoundingly echoed by others on the panel, taxonomies are hard work and expensive to build and maintain. The cost and effort are often reasons why taxonomies are not exhaustive nor emergent, as budgets and time constraints provide limits. Most often we follow the Pareto Principle (also know as the 80/20 rule) where we focus on 80 percent of the use with 20 percent of the resources (in reality we aim toward something more like a 90/40 rule), but we do have limitations. Taxonomies are also authoritative, but this is problematic for the people who have a vocabulary that is different than the authoritative vocabulary(or more correctly vocabularies). This means a taxonomy will most often have a limited view, which is not a reason to stop taxonomies, but a reason to augment them." (Thomas Vander Wal - Personal InfoCloud) Posted on January 17, 2006 | Permalink Classification and categorization: A difference that makes a difference"Examination of the systemic properties and forms of interaction that characterize classification and categorization reveals fundamental syntactic differences between the structure of classification systems and the structure of categorization systems. These distinctions lead to meaningful differences in the contexts within which information can be apprehended and influence the semantic information available to the individual. Structural and semantic differences between classification and categorization are differences that make a difference in the information environment by influencing the functional activities of an information system and by contributing to its constitution as an information environment." (Elin K. Jacob) - courtesy of vuk Posted on December 28, 2005 | Permalink The Year in Tags"2005 has proven that tags are both big (in the financial sense) and useful. Whether or not tagging is a game-changer will, I think, depend on what Yahoo, Amazon and Google do with tags in 2006. But with three big players in the tagging game there's a lot of opporunity for innovation." (Gene Smith - Tagsonomy) Posted on December 27, 2005 | Permalink Tagging gives Web a human meaning"If you've been to a technology event recently, especially one with a high concentration of digerati, you may have seen someone stand up and tell everyone what the event's Flickr tag is." - (Daniel Terdiman - C|Net) Posted on November 18, 2005 | Permalink The Memetic Web"The memetic web uses meme IDs from a set of memespace taxonomies to tag web page content. Meme tags greatly improve the precision and recall of search engines. The memography wiki establishes a new social classification system. It provides taxonomies and pages that describe what each meme is about. Anyone can tag pages with memes from memography, or follow rules to create non-conflicting memes for corporate and personal use. Memelinks to aboutness pages are URIs that can be used as RDF properties for the semantic web." - courtesy of petermorville Posted on November 04, 2005 | Permalink Folksonomy Definition and Wikipedia"(...) I love Wikis and they are incredible tools, but one has to understand the boundaries. Wikis are emergent information tools and they are social tools. They are one of the best collaboration tools around, they even work very well for personal uses. But, like anything else it takes understanding on how to use them and use the information in them." (Thomas Vander Wal) Posted on November 04, 2005 | Permalink A cognitive analysis of tagging"(...) the beauty of tagging is that it taps into an existing cognitive process without adding add much cognitive cost. At the cognitive level, people already make local, conceptual observations. Tagging decouples these conceptual observations from concerns about the overall categorical scheme. The challenge for tagging systems is to then do what the brain does - intelligent computation to make sense of these local observations, and an efficient, predictable way to ensure findability." (Rashmi Sinha) Posted on September 28, 2005 | Permalink The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems"Collaborative tagging describes the process by which many users add metadata in the form of keywords to shared content. Recently, collaborative tagging has grown in popularity on the web, on sites that allow users to tag bookmarks, photographs and other content. In this paper, we analyze the structure of collaborative tagging systems as well as their dynamical aspects. Specifically, we discovered regularities in user activity, tag frequencies, kinds of tags used, bursts of popularity in bookmarking and a remarkable stability in the relative proportions of tags within a given url. We also present a dynamical model of collaborative tagging that predicts these stable patterns and relates them to imitation and shared knowledge." (Scott Golder and Bernardo A. Huberman - Information Dynamics Laboratory, HP Labs) - courtesy of vukcosic Posted on September 13, 2005 | Permalink Cognatrix"(...) a native Mac OS X ('Cocoa/Aqua') application for thesaurus construction." (LGOSystems) - courtesy of theotherblog Posted on August 30, 2005 | Permalink Web 2.0: Data, Metadata and Interface"One key takeaway from the Web 2.0 panel was that data, interface and metadata no longer need to go hand in hand. When working on an application/website, one thinks of the overall picture including the data, the metadata, and the interface. With Web 2.0 apps, the data might be from one place, the metadata from another, and the interface from a third party or a remix. The diagram below shows the move towards Web 2.0 along with examples." (Rashmi Sinha) Posted on August 14, 2005 | Permalink Designing for the Personal InfoCloud"Presented to Vera Rhoads User Interaction with Information Systems class in the Master of Information Managment program at University of Maryland. This was presented to the class on July 26, 2005 and included elements from previous folksonomy presentations." (Thomas Vander Wal) Posted on August 01, 2005 | Permalink Hierarchy versus Facets versus Tags"Because hierarchies has been the designated one size fits all solution to all our organizational needs, we break our semantically pure hierarchies by overstretching their bounds. As a result, we end up with messy hierarchies that are unusable and unmaintainable." (OSAF Projects wiki) Posted on August 01, 2005 | Permalink fac.etio.us"(...) faceted navigation of del.icio.us feeds. An experimental service." (Siderean Software) - courtesy of marcel van mackelenbergh Posted on July 20, 2005 | Permalink Tagging for Fun and Finding"We all grew up knowing about tags. We had tags in our clothes, we had them on our holiday presents, we played a game called tag, and some even used spray cans to tag their turf. All of these uses of tag have different meanings, but unless we understand the context and/or the person using the word tag we do not know what they mean. This can be a problem with tagging on the web, but like everything else there are two sides to the story and there are some great benefits from tagging, if it is done well." (Thomas Vander Wal - OK/Cancel) Posted on July 03, 2005 | Permalink Folksonomies: Power to the people"We have gone past a critical mass of connectivity between people that has introduced a new revolutionary ability to communicate, collaborate and share goods online." (Emanuele Quintarelli - ISKOI) - courtesy of langemarkscafe Posted on June 26, 2005 | Permalink The Meta Data Support Model: Part 1/Part 2"Knowledge management, information architecture, content management, search engine technology and portalization are just a few of the evolutionary benefits of implementing meta data at the enterprise level. The meta data product line serves as the foundation from which processes and services can be built." (Metadata Portal) - courtesy of columntwo Posted on June 22, 2005 | Permalink Faceted ClassificationOverview of relevant links by del.icio.us according to Michael Scudder (del.icio.us) - courtesy of marcel van mackelenbergh Posted on June 09, 2005 | Permalink How to combine tags with facets"The big advantage of adding metadata in the form of facets is that we know how to make an easy to use interface for facets." (Peter van Dijck) Posted on June 05, 2005 | Permalink Taxonomies and Tags: From Trees to Piles of Leaves"The narrative that tells of the first man and woman encountering the tree of knowledge focuses on its tempting fruit. But after we took the bite, we apparently looked up and got the idea that knowledge is shaped like the tree's branching structure: Big concepts contain smaller ones that contain smaller ones yet. Over the millennia, we have fashioned the structures of knowledge in just such tree-like ways, from the departmental organization of universities (liberal arts contains history and history contains ancient Chinese history) to the hierarchy of species. The idea that knowledge is shaped like a tree is perhaps our oldest knowledge about knowledge." (David Weinberger - JOHO) Posted on May 22, 2005 | Permalink Connotea Beta"(...) a place to keep links to the articles you read and the websites you use, and a place to find them again. It is also a place where you can discover new articles and websites through sharing your links with other users. By saving your links and references to Connotea they are instantly on the web, which means that they are available to you from any computer and that you can point your friends and colleagues to them. In Connotea, every user's links are visible both to visitors and to every other user, and different users' libraries are linked together through the use of common tags or common bookmarks." (About Connotea) Posted on May 18, 2005 | Permalink Social Bookmarking Tools (I)/(II)"This paper reviews some current initiatives, as of early 2005, in providing public link management applications on the Web – utilities that are often referred to under the general moniker of 'social bookmarking tools'. There are a couple of things going on here: 1) server-side software aimed specifically at managing links with, crucially, a strong, social networking flavour, and 2) an unabashedly open and unstructured approach to tagging, or user classification, of those links." (Tony Hammond et al. - D-Lib Magazine April 2005) Posted on May 17, 2005 | Permalink The Future of Indexing?"A recent article in the Society for Technical Communications' Intercom magazine proclaimed that indexing is on the rise (Seth Maislin, "The Indexing Revival," February, 2005), and that there is a renaissance of work in the field. But at the WritersUA March Conference, Microsoft's Longhorn features session declared that Longhorn's Help system will not contain an index, because 'no one uses it'. Then, to add to the discussion, at that same conference Apple revealed that their next help engine will include synonym rings and will add a form of indexing back into their display. Who's right? Who's correctly predicting the trends?" (Jan Wright - WinWriters UA) - courtesy of usablehelp Posted on May 17, 2005 | Permalink Ontology is Overrated: Categories, Links, and Tags"Today I want to talk about categorization, and I want to convince you that a lot of what we think we know about categorization is wrong. In particular, I want to convince you that many of the ways we're attempting to apply categorization to the electronic world are actually a bad fit, because we've adopted habits of mind that are left over from earlier strategies." (Clay Shirky's Writings About the Internet) Posted on May 16, 2005 | Permalink Explaining and Showing Broad and Narrow Folksonomies"We benefit from folksonomies as the both the personal vocabulary and the social aspects help people to find and retain a tether to objects on the web that are an interest to them. Who is doing the tagging is important to understand and how the tags are consumed is an important factor." (Thomas Vanderwal - Personal InfoCloud) Posted on May 16, 2005 | Permalink Web 2.0 for Designers"Enter Web 2.0, a vision of the Web in which information is broken up into 'microcontent' units that can be distributed over dozens of domains. The Web of documents has morphed into a Web of data. We are no longer just looking to the same old sources for information. Now we're looking to a new set of tools to aggregate and remix microcontent in new and useful ways." (Richard MacManus & Joshua Porter - Digital Web Magazine) Posted on May 05, 2005 | Permalink Folksonomies: A User-Driven Approach to Organizing Content"One of the most promising features of folksonomies is that there is no disconnect between the user's words and the words on the site: the users words are the words on the site!" (Joshua Porter - User Interface Engineering) Posted on April 27, 2005 | Permalink Social Bookmarking Tools (I)"We are here going to remind you of hyperlinks in all their glory, sell you on the idea of bookmarking hyperlinks, point you at other folks who are doing the same, and tell you why this is a good thing. Just as long as those hyperlinks (or let's call them plain old links) are managed, tagged, commented upon, and published onto the Web, they represent a user's own personal library placed on public record, which – when aggregated with other personal libraries – allows for rich, social networking opportunities." (Tony Hammond - D-Lib Magazine) - courtesy of lucdesk Posted on April 21, 2005 | Permalink The Semantic Web Community Portal (beta)"If HTML and the Web made all the online documents look like one huge book, RDF, schema, and inference languages will make all the data in the world look like one huge database. - Tim Berners-Lee 1999" (Labs SemWeb) Posted on April 17, 2005 | Permalink Tags Turning Web Chaos into Categories"In the quest to organize the Web's information, an emerging approach is putting the power to categorize everything from links to digital photos into the hands of users." (Matt Hicks - eWeek) - courtesy of lawrence lee Posted on March 18, 2005 | Permalink IA Summit Folksonomies Panel"I thought the panel went well overall. Enough friction to keep the discussion interesting, smart presentations from the panelists, and good questions from the audience helped keep things rolling." (Gene Smith - Atomiq) Posted on March 11, 2005 | Permalink mSpace: Exploring the New Web"mSpace helps people build knowledge from exploring those relationships. mSpace does this by offering several powerful tools for organizing an information space to suit a person's interest: slicing, sorting, swapping, infoViews and preview cues." (M.C. Schraefel) - courtesy of nooface Posted on March 08, 2005 | Permalink Visualizing Shared Metadata: The Tag Landscape"While some continue to debate the usefulness of tag-based folksonomies, others are starting to build abstraction layers on top of a growing body of user-tagged data." - (The Social Software Weblog) - courtesy of langemarks cafe Posted on March 03, 2005 | Permalink Folksonomies Tap People Power"(...) as more people understand what tags are, how they work and why they're important, the number of participants in folksonomies has grown." (Daniel Terdiman - Wired) Posted on February 01, 2005 | Permalink Patterns in Unstructured Data: Discovery, Aggregation, and VisualizationA Presentation to the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation - "As of early 2002, there were just over two billion web pages listed in the Google search engine index, widely taken to be the most comprehensive. No one knows how many more web pages there are on the Internet, or the total number of documents available over the public network, but there is no question that the number is enormous and growing quickly. Every one of those web pages has come into existence within the past ten years. There are web sites covering every conceivable topic at every level of detail and expertise, and information ranging from numerical tables to personal diaries to public discussions. Never before have so many people had access to so much diverse information." (Clara Yu et al. - US National Institute for Technology and Liberal Education) - courtesy of frank cronk Posted on January 27, 2005 | Permalink Formal Taxonomies for the U.S. Government"For federal agencies trying to learn how to implement taxonomies, most examples in portals and on public websites are informal taxonomies where neither the nodes nor the associations between them are formally defined. Examples of such taxonomies can be found on yahoo.com, froogle.com, and dmoz.org. Such informal taxonomies are only useful for browsing and not for automated techniques like query expansion, rule execution, taxonomy integration, faceted classification, and inference. This article will examine the requirements of formal taxonomies and provide examples of each construct." (Michael Daconta - xml.com) Posted on January 27, 2005 | Permalink Taxonomies and classification schemas within the BBCMartin Belam presentation at IP Lezing in Amsterdam - "The conference was very well attended, with around 350 delegates - and I enjoyed meeting some really nice people, both before and after the event. The presentation is available to download - PowerPoint presentation, 3.8M - but it is a very large file. As usual much of the worth is in the notes, not the pictures in the slides themselves." (Martin Belam - currybetdotnet) Posted on January 26, 2005 | Permalink What Do Tags Mean?"I'm almost convinced that this new Technorati Tags thing is important, but I'm 100% convinced that I don't understand where it's going or what the implications are. Which is OK, because I suspect nobody else does either. (...) I've spent a lot of time thinking about metadata and have written on the subject; the most important conclusion was: There is no cheap metadata. I haven’t seen anything to make me change my mind." (Tim Bray - ongoing) Posted on January 20, 2005 | Permalink Understanding Taxonomies & Search for Corporate Applications"The content management software industry has discovered that promoting taxonomy delivers significant visibility. It has the desired effect of letting the market know that a vendor is a serious player in the content management market, while also driving prospects to their consulting practices. Taxonomy is one of those words that is so bandied about that everyone is sure to feel the need for one – whatever it is, whatever it does. Like many good ideas, useful business tools, or enabling components, taxonomy, when affiliated with a product, is given impossible hype." (Lynda Moulton - Gilbane Reports) - courtesy of columntwo Posted on January 11, 2005 | Permalink Folksonomies? How about Metadata Ecologies?"(...) though I'm not certain that the product of folksonomy development will have much long term value on their own, I'll bet dollars to donuts that the process of introducing a broader public to the act of developing and applying metadata will be incredibly invaluable." (Louis Rosenfeld) Posted on January 07, 2005 | Permalink Folksonomies: Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata"This paper examines user-generated metadata as implemented and applied in two web services designed to share and organize digital media to better understand grassroots classification. Metadata allows systems to collocate related information, and helps users find relevant information. The creation of metadata has generally been approached in two ways: professional creation and author creation. In libraries and other organizations, creating metadata, primarily in the form of catalog records, has traditionally been the domain of dedicated professionals working with complex, detailed rule sets and vocabularies. The primary problem with this approach is scalability and its impracticality for the vast amounts of content being produced and used, especially on the World Wide Web. The apparatus and tools built around professional cataloging systems are generally too complicated for anyone without specialized training and knowledge. A second approach is for metadata to be created by authors. The movement towards creator described documents was heralded by SGML, the WWW, and the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. There are problems with this approach as well - often due to inadequate or inaccurate description, or outright deception. This paper examines a third approach: user-created metadata, where users of the documents and media create metadata for their own individual use that is also shared throughout a community." (Adam Mathes - Graduate School of LIS, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign) - courtesy of joe tennis Posted on January 02, 2005 | Permalink Semantic Learning Webs"If current research is successful there will be a plethora of e-learning platforms making use of a varied menu of reusable educational material or learning objects. For the learner, the semanticized Web will, in addition, offer rich seams of diverse learning resources over and above the course materials (or learning objects) specified by course designers. This much is already in development. But we can go much further. Semantic technologies make it possible not only to reason about the Web as if it is one extended knowledge base but also to provide a range of additional educational semantic web services such as summarization, interpretation or sense-making, structure-visualization, and support for argumentation." (Knowledge Management Institute Reports) Posted on December 27, 2004 | Permalink Search Smarter, Not Harder"Databases and search engines provide instantaneous access to endless information about anyone or anything, but the search results often include as many misses as hits. To generate more-relevant answers, organizations including the federal government are using topic maps to index their data." (Wired) - courtesy of elearningpost Posted on December 01, 2004 | Permalink The Knowledge-Model Driven Enterprise"(...) carefully developed metadata provides the foundation for a knowledge-model driven enterprise, representing an enormous opportunity for information architects - a chance to extend their talents to enterprise-wide concerns that go well beyond website design." (Andy Schriever - Boxes and Arrows) Posted on November 23, 2004 | Permalink Metadata and XML: Improving the Findability of Information
|
|