Categories
- Accessibility (43)
- Adaptation (7)
- Audio design (3)
- Classics (74)
- Complexity (21)
- Content curation (1)
- Content management (55)
- Content strategy (161)
- Customer experience (27)
- Design research (101)
- Events (193)
- HCI (298)
- Hypertext (63)
- Information architecture (720)
- Information design (877)
- Information graphics (81)
- InfoViz (99)
- Instructional design (15)
- Interaction design (236)
- Interviews (325)
- Metadata (244)
- Mobile design (118)
- Navigation (63)
- Patterns (70)
- Personas (69)
- Podcasts (65)
- Prototyping (18)
- Search (153)
- SemWeb (4)
- Service design (143)
- Social Web (76)
- Special (27)
- Tablet design (26)
- Tagpipe (3)
- TechCom (62)
- Technology (202)
- Typography (42)
- UCD (224)
- Usability (658)
- User experience (937)
- User research (3)
- Visual design (78)
- Weblogs (129)
- Wireframes (20)
- Writing (87)
Recent comments
Powered by
September 19, 2011
Wizards Versus Forms
But where's the magic from these wizards?
"When I find myself designing an application that is complex, either in terms of its length or its logical dependencies, my natural instinct is to take a wizard approach. Wizards are cool; forms are dull. Product managers love wizards because they are so Web 2.0. Developers like wizards because they involve more programming expertise than just cranking out forms."
(Mike Hughes ~ UXmatters)
Posted by PJB at September 19, 2011 10:48 AM | Classification: Information design